{"id":1659,"date":"2026-04-25T15:40:42","date_gmt":"2026-04-25T10:10:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/?p=1659"},"modified":"2026-05-01T12:52:33","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T07:22:33","slug":"lemlist-vs-mailshake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/lemlist-vs-mailshake\/","title":{"rendered":"Lemlist vs Mailshake: Which Cold Email Tool Is Better in 2026?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Most cold email tool comparisons tell you both options are “great, it just depends on your needs.” That is not useful when you are about to spend $79 to $109 per user per month and commit to a platform for your entire outbound motion. Lemlist vs Mailshake is not a coin flip. These two tools are built for different types of outreach teams, with different pricing structures, different deliverability approaches, and very different ideas about what “personalization” means. This article breaks down every layer that actually matters, from the 2026 pricing changes most reviews have not caught up to, to the LinkedIn automation safety gap that could get your account flagged. By the end, you will know exactly which tool fits your team and why.<\/p>\n

\n

TL;DR: The 60-Second Verdict<\/h2>\n

Lemlist is the better choice for teams running multichannel outreach across email, LinkedIn, and calls, especially when visual personalization (dynamic images, video thumbnails, personalized landing pages) is part of the strategy. Mailshake is the better choice for small teams that want clean, reliable email sequences up and running fast, without a steep learning curve, and who need a built-in phone dialer alongside email.<\/p>\n

One critical update before you read further: Lemlist raised its prices by $10 per user per month for all new customers starting February 2026. Legacy customers kept their old rates, but anyone signing up now pays the new price. The entry plan for new Lemlist customers is now $79 per user per month on monthly billing, not the $69 figure you will see on older comparison articles. Mailshake’s pricing has not changed: $59 per user per month for Email Outreach and $99 per user per month for Sales Engagement.<\/p>\n

If email-only outreach at a simple price point is your goal, Mailshake wins. If LinkedIn is a real part of your sequence (not just a nice-to-have you might add someday), and your deals justify the effort of richer personalization, Lemlist is worth the higher cost.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Lemlist vs. Mailshake: Side-by-Side Comparison Table<\/h2>\n

The table below reflects verified pricing and features as of April 2026. Sources include official pricing pages, G2, Capterra, and third-party pricing analyses.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Feature<\/th>\nLemlist<\/th>\nMailshake<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Entry plan price<\/strong><\/td>\n$79\/user\/month (new customers, monthly billing)<\/td>\n$29\/user\/month (Starter, very limited)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mid-tier price<\/strong><\/td>\n$109\/user\/month (Multichannel Expert)<\/td>\n$59\/user\/month (Email Outreach)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Top plan price<\/strong><\/td>\nEnterprise (custom, 5-seat minimum)<\/td>\n$99\/user\/month (Sales Engagement)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Annual billing discount<\/strong><\/td>\n20% off<\/td>\nApprox. 15-25% off (varies)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Free trial<\/strong><\/td>\n14 days (no credit card required)<\/td>\nNo free trial<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Free plan<\/strong><\/td>\nYes (limited: Chrome extension, 100 leads\/month)<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Email sequences<\/strong><\/td>\nUnlimited on all paid plans<\/td>\nUnlimited (Email Outreach and above)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LinkedIn automation<\/strong><\/td>\nYes (Multichannel Expert plan only)<\/td>\nYes (Sales Engagement plan only, basic)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Built-in AI writing tool<\/strong><\/td>\nYes (AI icebreakers, variable personalization)<\/td>\nYes (SHAKEspeare AI writer)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Email warm-up<\/strong><\/td>\nLemwarm (included in most paid plans)<\/td>\nBuilt-in warm-up + partner with Mailflow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Lead\/prospect database<\/strong><\/td>\n450 million+ contacts<\/td>\nData Finder (limited credits per plan)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Image\/video personalization<\/strong><\/td>\nYes (dynamic images, video thumbnails)<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Personalized landing pages<\/strong><\/td>\nYes (Multichannel Expert)<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CRM integrations<\/strong><\/td>\nHubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive (Email Pro and above)<\/td>\nHubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive (Email Outreach and above)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Built-in phone dialer<\/strong><\/td>\nVia Aircall (third-party integration)<\/td>\nYes (Sales Engagement plan, built-in)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
G2 rating<\/strong><\/td>\n4.4\/5<\/td>\n4.7\/5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Best for<\/strong><\/td>\nMultichannel outreach, high-personalization campaigns<\/td>\nEmail-first teams, simple setup, phone + email<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

What Each Tool Is Built For (And Where They Diverge)<\/h2>\n

Understanding the origin story of a tool tells you more about its real strengths than any feature list does. Lemlist and Mailshake were built to solve different problems, and that shows up in every design decision they have made since.<\/p>\n

Lemlist: Multichannel with Personalization at the Center<\/h3>\n

\"Lemlist\u00a0\"<\/p>\n

Lemlist was founded in 2018 to solve a specific problem: cold emails that looked like cold emails. The platform was built around dynamic image personalization, a feature that lets you automatically insert a prospect’s name, company logo, or LinkedIn profile photo into a custom-designed image inside the email body. That one feature drove early adoption and defined Lemlist’s identity.<\/p>\n

The platform became known for its image personalization feature that dynamically inserts prospect information into visuals. Initially focused on email outreach, Lemlist later added LinkedIn automation to meet market demand for multi-channel approaches. While it now supports both channels, its core strength remains in creative email personalization. The tool works best for teams who want visually engaging email campaigns with supplementary LinkedIn capabilities.<\/p>\n

Today, Lemlist operates as a multichannel sales engagement platform. Beyond dynamic images, it supports automated LinkedIn connection requests, profile visits, LinkedIn message sequences, and cold calling through Aircall integration. Everything runs from a single campaign builder with a drag-and-drop interface. Its built-in lead database of 450 million contacts means teams can prospect and sequence from one platform without needing a separate data tool for basic list building.<\/p>\n

The Lemwarm feature (Lemlist’s email warm-up tool) gradually increases sending volume over time to build sender reputation and reduce the risk of landing in spam. It is included in most paid plans, though some tiers charge for it separately as an add-on. The credit system (credits are used to find and verify contact data, not to send emails) is the part of Lemlist’s pricing that most users find confusing, and that section of this article covers it in detail.<\/p>\n

Lemlist targets SDRs (Sales Development Representatives), lead generation agencies, recruiters, and B2B sales teams that need to run personalized outreach at scale. Its community, blog, and webinar content are genuinely good, and active Facebook and LinkedIn groups provide real peer support, which matters for teams that will need to troubleshoot campaigns.<\/p>\n

Mailshake: Email-First Simplicity with a Phone Dialer Bolt-On<\/h3>\n

\"Mailshake\"<\/p>\n

Mailshake was launched in 2015 as a streamlined cold email tool focused on simplicity and deliverability. The platform strips away complexity, making it accessible for sales teams of all technical levels. Built around what matters most in email campaigns, Mailshake has maintained its reputation for reliability while expanding into additional channels.<\/p>\n

Its expansion into LinkedIn and phone came later and reflects market pressure rather than a foundational redesign. The LinkedIn automation features available in Mailshake are limited to viewing profiles, following, sending connection requests, and sending direct messages. There is no Chrome extension required for these actions (unlike Lemlist), which reduces some safety risk, but the functionality does not go much deeper than those four actions.<\/p>\n

The SHAKEspeare AI writer is Mailshake’s most-discussed feature addition in recent years. It generates personalized email copy by drawing from a dataset of successful cold email campaigns, and it also produces multiple A\/B variants using Spintax (a system that rotates synonyms and sentence structures to diversify email content). The result is usable first drafts that reduce the time spent writing sequences from scratch.<\/p>\n

Mailshake’s built-in phone dialer (Sales Engagement plan only) is a genuine differentiator for teams that run cold calling alongside cold email. It supports local presence numbers, voicemail drop, and call recording, all from the same dashboard as the email sequences. That combination, email plus phone in one tool under $100 per user per month, is something most competitors either do not offer or charge significantly more for.<\/p>\n

The platform’s G2 rating of 4.7 out of 5 (based on over 360 verified reviews) reflects consistent user satisfaction, particularly around ease of use and customer support quality. Complaints cluster around limited LinkedIn functionality, basic analytics, and the absence of a free trial.<\/p>\n

Pricing Breakdown: What You Actually Pay in 2026<\/h2>\n

The advertised price and the actual price are two different things for both of these tools. Here is what each platform’s billing structure looks like when you account for all the variables.<\/p>\n

Lemlist Pricing (Updated for 2026)<\/h3>\n

Lemlist raised prices by $10 per user per month for all new customers starting February 5, 2026. Existing customers kept their current pricing unless they changed plans or churned and re-subscribed.<\/p>\n

For new customers signing up in 2026, the pricing tiers are:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Email Pro:<\/strong>\u00a0$79 per user per month (monthly billing), $63 per user per month (annual billing)<\/li>\n
  • Multichannel Expert:<\/strong>\u00a0$109 per user per month (monthly billing), $87 per user per month (annual billing)<\/li>\n
  • Enterprise:<\/strong>\u00a0Custom-quoted, five-seat minimum on annual contracts<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Annual billing saves 20% versus monthly, which is the single biggest cost lever available to buyers before negotiating. Quarterly billing saves 10%.<\/p>\n

    What sits on top of the base plan price matters just as much as the plan itself:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Additional sending addresses:<\/strong>\u00a0$9 per mailbox per month beyond the included allotment. The Email Pro plan includes 3 sending addresses per user; Multichannel Expert includes 5. Teams running inbox rotation strategies (sending from multiple addresses to improve deliverability) will hit this add-on quickly.<\/li>\n
    • Credits:<\/strong>\u00a0Lemlist uses a credit system for its lead database (the Lead Finder). Credits are consumed when you find or verify contact data, not when you send emails. Email sending is unlimited on all paid plans. Credits do not roll over month to month; unused credits are lost at the end of each billing cycle. According to official Lemlist documentation updated in 2026, “If you don’t spend all your credits within the month, they won’t roll over to the next month.” The Email Pro plan includes 1,000 credits per month. Enriching 1,000 leads with emails costs 5,000 credits (5 credits per email found), meaning the base plan covers 200 verified email finds per month, not 1,000 as the number might suggest.<\/li>\n
    • Lemwarm as an add-on:<\/strong>\u00a0Some Lemlist plan configurations charge separately for Lemwarm at $29 per seat. This depends on the plan tier and whether it is listed as included or as an add-on for that account’s configuration. Confirm this at signup if warm-up is central to your deliverability strategy.<\/li>\n
    • Additional credits:<\/strong>\u00a0If you run out of credits before the month ends, Lemlist sells additional credits at $50 for 5,000 credits, which works out to $0.01 per credit.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Most teams end up paying 30 to 50% above the base plan price once additional sending addresses, lead credits, and add-ons are accounted for. A two-person team on the Multichannel Expert plan with three extra sending addresses each and moderate credit usage is realistically looking at $300 to $350 per month, not the $218 the base plan would suggest.<\/p>\n

      Mailshake Pricing (Three Tiers Explained)<\/h3>\n

      Mailshake has three pricing tiers as of 2026:<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Starter:<\/strong>\u00a0$29 per user per month<\/li>\n
      • Email Outreach:<\/strong>\u00a0$59 per user per month<\/li>\n
      • Sales Engagement:<\/strong>\u00a0$99 per user per month<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        Unlike Lemlist, Mailshake bills monthly by default without requiring annual commitment, though annual billing is available for a discount.<\/p>\n

        The Starter plan at $29 is worth addressing directly because it appears affordable but is barely functional for serious outbound. At that price point, the plan is essentially an email tracking layer on top of Gmail or Outlook. There are no sequences, no automation, and no CRM sync. For any team doing actual cold outbound, it is a stepping stone that gets outgrown within the first week. The moment a second sending address is needed, buying a second seat at $29 ends up at $58 per month, which is close enough to the Email Outreach plan at $59 that the Starter plan loses its value case entirely.<\/p>\n

        The Email Outreach plan at $59 per user per month is the real entry point for outbound teams. It includes unlimited email sending, automated sequences, A\/B testing, CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive), the SHAKEspeare AI writer, and an email deliverability setup assistant. This plan does not include LinkedIn automation or the phone dialer.<\/p>\n

        The Sales Engagement plan at $99 per user per month adds LinkedIn automation, the built-in phone dialer (with local presence numbers, voicemail drop, and call recording), 10,000 list-cleaning credits per month, and a 10,000-recipient campaign limit. This is Mailshake’s most complete tier and the one that makes it genuinely competitive as a multichannel tool.<\/p>\n

        Mailshake’s pricing model has no annual discount gymnastics or complex credit systems. What you see on the pricing page is closer to what you pay than Lemlist’s structure, though teams on the Sales Engagement plan still need to budget for a separate contact database since Mailshake’s Data Finder credits are limited.<\/p>\n

        Cost Comparison at Scale: 3, 5, and 10 Users<\/h3>\n

        The following cost estimates use monthly billing rates for both platforms and reflect realistic usage including additional email addresses for Lemlist users running inbox rotation.<\/p>\n

        3-person team:<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        <\/th>\nLemlist (Multichannel Expert)<\/th>\nMailshake (Sales Engagement)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
        Base plan cost<\/td>\n$327\/month (3 x $109)<\/td>\n$297\/month (3 x $99)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Additional sending addresses (3 extra per user)<\/td>\n$81\/month (9 x $9)<\/td>\nIncluded (up to 1 per user by default)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Estimated total<\/td>\n~$408\/month<\/td>\n~$297\/month<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

        5-person team:<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        <\/th>\nLemlist (Multichannel Expert)<\/th>\nMailshake (Sales Engagement)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
        Base plan cost<\/td>\n$545\/month (5 x $109)<\/td>\n$495\/month (5 x $99)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Additional sending addresses<\/td>\n$135\/month (15 x $9)<\/td>\nIncluded<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Estimated total<\/td>\n~$680\/month<\/td>\n~$495\/month<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

        10-person team:<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
        <\/th>\nLemlist (Multichannel Expert)<\/th>\nMailshake (Sales Engagement)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
        Base plan cost<\/td>\n$1,090\/month<\/td>\n$990\/month<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Additional sending addresses<\/td>\n$270\/month<\/td>\nIncluded<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
        Estimated total<\/td>\n~$1,360\/month<\/td>\n~$990\/month<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

        These estimates do not include credit top-ups, which are usage-dependent. For teams doing heavy prospecting through Lemlist’s Lead Finder, the credit cost can add another $50 to $150 per month at the team level. For Mailshake teams needing a separate contact database (which most will), tools like Apollo.io or Clay add $100 to $500 per month depending on volume.<\/p>\n

        Feature Face-Off: Where Each Tool Wins and Loses<\/h2>\n

        Email Personalization<\/h3>\n

        Lemlist and Mailshake both personalize emails, but the approach and depth are meaningfully different. Lemlist’s standout feature is dynamic image personalization. You create a template image (a graphic, a screenshot, a banner, a whiteboard photo) and define placeholder zones where prospect-specific data automatically populates: the prospect’s first name on a sticky note, their company logo in a branded header, their website screenshot inside a browser mockup. Every recipient sees a version of the image that appears to have been created specifically for them.<\/p>\n

        This feature generates measurably higher engagement for the right campaigns. Lemlist users targeting high-value accounts report open rates as high as 70% in specific campaign setups, though results vary considerably by industry, list quality, and sequence structure. The key caveat is that this level of personalization takes time to set up and only pays off when the average deal size justifies the effort. Lemlist’s personalization tools often generate 2 to 3 times better qualified lead rates for teams targeting decision-makers who receive hundreds of cold emails weekly, though this approach breaks down for high-volume, lower-ticket sales where personalization time exceeds the marginal revenue benefit. Teams selling products under $1,000 typically find the return on investment does not justify the additional effort required.<\/p>\n

        Mailshake’s email personalization is text-based: custom variables, merge tags, and dynamic fields that pull from your uploaded CSV columns. It does what every solid cold email tool does at the text level. The SHAKEspeare AI writer adds a layer on top by generating multiple personalized variants of your email copy. You write one version; SHAKEspeare produces additional variants using Spintax, which rotates synonyms and sentence structures across recipients. This approach diversifies your sending content, which has a secondary benefit for deliverability since sending the exact same email to hundreds of people in a short window can trigger spam detection.<\/p>\n

        For most cold email teams running moderate volume outreach, Mailshake’s text personalization is sufficient. The gap opens up when dealing with cold audiences who are heavily pitched, such as SaaS founders, VCs, and enterprise decision-makers, where standing out visually can meaningfully increase reply rates.<\/p>\n

        LinkedIn Automation (And Why Safety Matters in 2026)<\/h3>\n

        LinkedIn automation is the area where the difference between these two tools matters most for your account’s long-term health. LinkedIn has intensified detection and enforcement over the past two years. Accounts that show automated behavior patterns risk temporary restrictions, permanent bans, or removal of premium features.<\/p>\n

        Lemlist’s LinkedIn automation runs through a Chrome extension. When you add LinkedIn steps to a Lemlist sequence, the extension simulates user actions in the browser: visiting profiles, clicking connections, sending messages. This method is detectable. LinkedIn monitors browsing patterns and can identify non-human behavior through session analysis, timing signatures, and action velocity. Lemlist offers basic safety settings (daily action limits, random delays between actions), but the Chrome extension architecture carries inherent detection risk that cloud-based tools do not.<\/p>\n

        Mailshake does not require a Chrome extension for LinkedIn automation. Unlike Lemlist, you do not have to download a Chrome extension to automate basic LinkedIn functions, but you do have to opt for the more expensive pricing plan. Moreover, the only LinkedIn automation options available are viewing and following a profile and sending a message or a connection request. This narrower feature set reduces risk exposure, but it also means Mailshake’s LinkedIn capability is shallow. If your LinkedIn strategy extends beyond basic connection requests and follow-up messages, Mailshake does not go further.<\/p>\n

        For teams where LinkedIn is a secondary touchpoint (send a connection request if no email reply after three days), either tool is workable. For teams building structured LinkedIn sequences where the channel carries meaningful weight in pipeline generation, the safety architecture of the automation tool becomes a material consideration, not just a checkbox.<\/p>\n

        AI Writing Tools: SHAKEspeare vs. Lemlist’s AI<\/h3>\n

        Both platforms have AI writing assistance, but they approach it differently and produce different outputs.<\/p>\n

        Mailshake’s SHAKEspeare AI writer generates email copy by drawing from a dataset of successful cold email campaigns. The practical output: usable first drafts that follow structures known to generate replies, plus A\/B variants created through Spintax. It also does A\/B testing with email segments, allowing you to write one version and have SHAKEspeare create additional variants for testing. The Spintax feature specifically improves deliverability by ensuring that recipients across the same campaign receive slightly different versions of the email, which reduces the fingerprinting risk that identical mass emails carry.<\/p>\n

        Lemlist’s AI focuses primarily on personalization at the field level rather than generating full email drafts. It generates AI icebreakers (personalized opening lines based on a prospect’s LinkedIn profile, company news, or job title), fills in variable fields intelligently, and can write sequence suggestions. The credit system means AI-powered actions consume credits, so heavy AI usage needs to be factored into monthly credit budgets. Lemlist’s AI is less about producing full email copy and more about scaling the kind of personalized openers that would otherwise require manual research per prospect.<\/p>\n

        Neither tool replaces a skilled copywriter for complex enterprise sequences. Both reduce the time it takes to get a workable sequence live. SHAKEspeare is better for teams that want full email drafts quickly; Lemlist’s AI is better for teams that already have their messaging framework and need to personalize opening lines at scale without spending two minutes per prospect doing LinkedIn research manually.<\/p>\n

        Email Deliverability<\/h3>\n

        Deliverability is the part of cold email tool comparisons that everyone mentions and almost nobody covers properly. Here is what each platform actually provides.<\/p>\n

        Lemlist’s primary deliverability tool is Lemwarm, a warm-up network that gradually increases sending volume by having your email account exchange emails with other accounts in the Lemwarm network. This builds sender reputation over time with email providers like Google and Microsoft, signaling that your account is active, receives replies, and is not sending spam. The Lemwarm feature gradually increases your sending volume and helps you land in your audience’s inbox by bypassing spam filters through a natural rhythm. Lemlist also supports custom tracking domains, which keeps your tracking pixel subdomain off shared infrastructure that might be flagged by spam filters. It allows inbox rotation across multiple sending addresses, distributing volume and reducing the per-mailbox sending pressure that triggers deliverability problems.<\/p>\n

        Mailshake’s deliverability approach centers on its spam score analysis tool, which alerts you when something in your email deliverability configuration is wrong. It handles bounce detection and automatic list cleaning, which removes unqualified or invalid contacts and protects your sender reputation from the damage that high bounce rates cause. Mailshake also provides an email deliverability setup assistant that walks new users through SPF, DKIM, and DMARC record configuration on their sending domain. The Sales Engagement plan includes 10,000 list-cleaning credits per month, which is a meaningful tool for teams importing large prospect lists of uncertain quality.<\/p>\n

        The honest assessment: Lemlist has more deliverability features. Lemwarm, inbox rotation, custom tracking domains, and send-time optimization in a single platform give it an edge over Mailshake’s deliverability stack. Mailshake is reliable and its spam analysis is genuinely useful, but it lacks the warm-up network depth and inbox rotation sophistication that Lemlist provides.<\/p>\n

        What neither platform can fix is a fundamentally broken sending setup. If your domain is brand new, your SPF\/DKIM\/DMARC records are misconfigured, your prospect list has a 15% bounce rate, or you are sending 500 emails per day from a single mailbox, no tool’s deliverability features will save you. The platform supports a good sending setup; it does not replace one.<\/p>\n

        Ease of Use and Onboarding<\/h3>\n

        Mailshake is significantly easier to set up and start using than Lemlist. New users can typically get a campaign live within an hour without extensive training. The interface is clean and focused: connect your email, upload your prospect list, write your sequence, set your sending schedule. Mailshake is known for its simple, user-friendly interface that makes campaign creation straightforward, with the platform focusing on keeping things clean and easy to navigate.<\/p>\n

        Lemlist has a steeper learning curve. The drag-and-drop campaign builder is intuitive once you understand the logic, but first-time users often find the interface unintuitive when managing multiple campaigns or navigating between features. Setting up image personalization templates requires time and some design sensibility. Configuring the credit system, understanding Lemwarm settings, and managing LinkedIn steps alongside email steps takes longer to get right. Lemlist has an interface that’s generally intuitive, though some users mention a learning curve when first getting started, and some reviewers note the interface can feel overwhelming when managing multiple campaigns or navigating between features.<\/p>\n

        For teams with a dedicated operations person or an experienced outreach manager, Lemlist’s complexity pays off in capability. For a founder running outreach solo, or a small sales team without an operations function, Mailshake’s faster onboarding means sequences go live sooner, which often matters more than feature depth.<\/p>\n

        Customer support quality favors Mailshake. Mailshake offers excellent customer support including concierge onboarding and one-on-one guidance for campaign optimization. Multiple user reviews cite Mailshake’s support team proactively reaching out with campaign advice. Lemlist’s support quality is more variable based on user reports, with some reviewers citing slow response times and others praising the community resources.<\/p>\n

        Integrations and CRM Sync<\/h3>\n

        Both platforms integrate natively with HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive. Both use Zapier for broader third-party connectivity. The practical differences are in depth and plan gating.<\/p>\n

        For Lemlist, CRM integrations require the Email Pro plan or above. On the Email Pro plan, contact syncing, activity logging, and deal management work with all three major CRMs. The HubSpot integration updates contact records automatically when prospects reply, click, or are marked as interested. Users on legacy plans sometimes report sync delays, and the integration requires initial configuration that takes 30 to 60 minutes to set up correctly.<\/p>\n

        For Mailshake, CRM integrations are available on the Email Outreach plan and above. Some users note that Mailshake’s HubSpot integration is less deep than expected, with certain fields not syncing automatically and updates happening less frequently than ideal for teams running high-velocity sequences. Salesforce and Pipedrive integrations are generally rated more positively.<\/p>\n

        Lemlist’s Chrome extension also allows adding leads directly to a Lemlist campaign while browsing LinkedIn, which removes the step of exporting a CSV and re-importing it. For teams doing manual LinkedIn prospecting alongside automated sequences, this is a practical time saver.<\/p>\n

        Neither platform offers a native integration with Clay (the data enrichment and workflow tool increasingly used by sophisticated outbound teams in 2026), but both connect via API or Zapier.<\/p>\n

        Deliverability in 2026: What the Platforms Do Not Tell You<\/h2>\n

        This section covers the deliverability reality that vendor marketing glosses over, because both Lemlist and Mailshake have an incentive to make deliverability sound like something their platform solves for you automatically. It does not work that way.<\/p>\n

        The core truth: your sending infrastructure and list quality determine your deliverability far more than which cold email platform you use. Two teams using the same tool can have wildly different deliverability outcomes based on decisions made outside the software.<\/p>\n

        Here is what actually drives inbox placement:<\/p>\n

          \n
        • Domain age and reputation:<\/strong>\u00a0New domains have no reputation history. Email providers apply higher scrutiny to domains registered less than 90 days ago. Sending significant volume from a new domain without a 4 to 8 week warm-up period almost guarantees spam placement, regardless of which tool you use.<\/li>\n
        • DMARC, DKIM, and SPF configuration:<\/strong>\u00a0These three authentication protocols tell receiving servers that your email is legitimate and that you are who you say you are. Misconfigured or absent records cause deliverability failures that no warm-up tool can compensate for. Both Lemlist and Mailshake provide setup guidance, but the configuration happens at the DNS level, outside both platforms.<\/li>\n
        • Sending volume per mailbox:<\/strong>\u00a0The standard safe benchmark for a warmed-up cold email mailbox is approximately 30 to 50 emails per day. Teams that push a single mailbox to 150 or 200 sends per day will see deliverability degrade. Both platforms support inbox rotation to distribute volume across multiple sending addresses, but Lemlist’s rotation features are more developed.<\/li>\n
        • List quality and bounce rate:<\/strong>\u00a0A bounce rate above 3% signals to email providers that the sender is using unverified lists. A bounce rate above 5% can trigger automatic throttling or suspension by Google Workspace and Microsoft 365. Cleaning lists before import is not optional; it is table stakes for anyone running cold outreach at volume.<\/li>\n
        • Email content and engagement signals:<\/strong>\u00a0Emails that get opened, replied to, and clicked improve sender reputation over time. Emails that get deleted unread, marked as spam, or ignored in bulk do the opposite. Personalization is not just a conversion tactic; it is a deliverability strategy, because emails that generate replies build the sender reputation that keeps future emails out of spam.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          What Lemlist provides that is genuinely valuable for deliverability: Lemwarm’s warm-up network, inbox rotation across multiple addresses, custom tracking domains, and send-time optimization. What Mailshake provides: spam score analysis, bounce detection, list cleaning credits, and a deliverability setup assistant. Both platforms support SPF\/DKIM\/DMARC configuration guidance. Neither replaces a properly configured sending infrastructure, but Lemlist’s toolset is more complete for teams managing deliverability proactively.<\/p>\n

          The Mailshake Starter plan’s cap of 1,500 sends per month is a genuine constraint for growing teams. Once that limit is hit, the choice is to upgrade to Email Outreach at $59 or buy additional seats. The Email Outreach plan removes the volume cap and allows unlimited sends, which is a material difference for teams that need to scale.<\/p>\n

          Pros and Cons<\/h2>\n

          Lemlist Pros and Cons<\/h3>\n

          Pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n

            \n
          • Dynamic image and video personalization is genuinely unique. No other major cold email platform does this as well, and for the right campaigns targeting high-value prospects, it produces meaningfully better reply rates.<\/li>\n
          • Multichannel sequences combining email, LinkedIn, and calls run from a single campaign builder, removing the need for separate tools for each channel.<\/li>\n
          • The built-in lead database of 450 million contacts reduces dependence on a separate prospecting tool for teams that are doing basic list building, not advanced targeting.<\/li>\n
          • Lemwarm, inbox rotation, and custom tracking domains give Lemlist a stronger native deliverability toolkit than most competitors at the same price point.<\/li>\n
          • A 14-day free trial with no credit card required is available, which is a meaningful advantage over Mailshake’s no-trial policy.<\/li>\n
          • The community around Lemlist (Facebook group, LinkedIn community, regular webinars) is one of the more active communities in the cold email space, which has practical value for troubleshooting and campaign inspiration.<\/li>\n
          • Advanced conditions in sequences allow Lemlist to simulate human-like behavior, adjusting follow-up timing and channel based on how a prospect has engaged.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            Cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            • The February 2026 price increase makes Lemlist one of the more expensive cold email tools on a per-seat basis, particularly for new customers. A two-person team on the Multichannel Expert plan pays over $200 per month before add-ons.<\/li>\n
            • The credit system with no monthly rollover creates pressure to use credits whether or not campaigns are ready, and unused credits are wasted money.<\/li>\n
            • Per-seat pricing scales linearly with team size, meaning costs double when the team doubles. There is no volume discount below the Enterprise tier.<\/li>\n
            • LinkedIn automation runs through a Chrome extension, which carries detection risk compared to cloud-based alternatives.<\/li>\n
            • Some user reviews on G2 flag predatory billing practices, including charges after cancellation and difficulty obtaining refunds. This is not universal, but it appears in enough reviews to warrant caution before signing an annual contract.<\/li>\n
            • Setup complexity is real. New users frequently report a learning curve that delays time-to-first-campaign compared to simpler tools.<\/li>\n
            • LinkedIn features on the Multichannel Expert plan are less advanced than dedicated LinkedIn automation platforms. Complex LinkedIn workflows, smart reply detection, and multi-step conditional sequences are better handled by tools built specifically for LinkedIn.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              Mailshake Pros and Cons<\/h3>\n

              Pros:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                \n
              • The interface is clean and the onboarding is fast. A new user can have a campaign live within an hour, which matters for small teams without an ops function.<\/li>\n
              • SHAKEspeare AI writer generates full email drafts and Spintax variants, reducing copy creation time and adding deliverability benefits through content variation.<\/li>\n
              • The built-in phone dialer on the Sales Engagement plan gives Mailshake a genuine multichannel story for email-plus-phone teams. At $99 per user per month, it is more affordable than buying separate cold email and cold calling tools.<\/li>\n
              • Customer support is consistently rated highly across G2 and Capterra reviews. Mailshake offers concierge onboarding, one-on-one campaign guidance, and deliverability training on all plans.<\/li>\n
              • The pricing structure is transparent. There is no credit system or rollover complexity. What you see on the pricing page is close to what you pay.<\/li>\n
              • List cleaning credits on the Sales Engagement plan (10,000 per month) help maintain list hygiene without a separate email verification tool.<\/li>\n
              • Mailshake has been bootstrapped and independent since 2015, which contributes to product stability and a long track record of reliability.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                Cons:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                  \n
                • No free trial. This is a meaningful barrier for teams that want to test the product before committing money. Mailshake does not offer a trial on any plan.<\/li>\n
                • The Starter plan at $29 is severely limited. No sequences, no automation, no CRM sync. It is functionally a tracked email layer, not a cold outreach tool. Teams that buy it expecting to run outbound campaigns will immediately need to upgrade.<\/li>\n
                • LinkedIn automation is basic. Connection requests, profile views, follows, and direct messages are the full scope. Teams with a real LinkedIn outreach motion will outgrow it.<\/li>\n
                • No built-in lead database. Mailshake does not help you find prospects; it sequences the ones you bring. The Data Finder feature provides some contact lookup capability with limited credits, but it is not a replacement for a dedicated prospecting tool.<\/li>\n
                • Email personalization is text-only. Dynamic images, video thumbnails, and personalized landing pages are not available on any Mailshake plan.<\/li>\n
                • Per G2 and Capterra user reviews, some users report issues with the annual billing structure, the no-refund policy, and not receiving cancellation confirmations. These are billing and trust issues rather than product problems, but they are worth knowing before committing to an annual plan.<\/li>\n
                • Deliverability features are less developed than Lemlist’s. No built-in warm-up network of Lemwarm’s scale, no advanced inbox rotation, and no custom tracking domain support on lower plans.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                  Who Should Choose Which Tool<\/h2>\n

                  Choose Lemlist If…<\/h3>\n
                    \n
                  • Multichannel outreach across email, LinkedIn, and calls is a core part of your strategy, not a future plan. LinkedIn needs to be something your team actively works into sequences today, not a channel you might add someday. The Multichannel Expert plan is the only Lemlist tier that includes LinkedIn, and at $109 per user per month monthly, it represents a real commitment.<\/li>\n
                  • Your average deal size is high enough to justify deep personalization. Dynamic image personalization, personalized landing pages, and video thumbnails take time and design effort to set up properly. If your average contract value is above $10,000 and you are targeting named accounts or specific personas, that effort has a clear return. If you are selling a $500 product to a broad audience, the math does not work.<\/li>\n
                  • You want a built-in lead database and sequencing tool in one place without stitching together a separate prospecting tool for basic list building. Lemlist’s 450 million contact database handles initial prospecting, though teams doing sophisticated targeting by buying signal, tech stack, or intent data will still need Clay or Apollo alongside it.<\/li>\n
                  • Your team has an operations person or an experienced outreach manager who can handle the setup complexity and manage the credit system. Lemlist rewards teams that invest time in configuration. It penalizes teams that expect to be running in an hour.<\/li>\n
                  • You want a free trial before committing. Lemlist offers 14 days with no credit card required. That is enough time to run a complete multichannel sequence and evaluate performance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                    Choose Mailshake If…<\/h3>\n
                      \n
                    • Your outreach is email-first, and LinkedIn is at most a secondary touchpoint for a small subset of prospects. If 80% or more of your pipeline comes from email sequences, Mailshake’s email Outreach plan at $59 per user per month delivers what you need without paying for features you will not use.<\/li>\n
                    • Your team is small (one to three people) and you need the fastest possible path from “we should do cold outreach” to “we have a campaign running.” Mailshake’s onboarding time is genuinely faster. For a founder running outreach alongside product work, or an early-stage sales hire building the outbound function from scratch, that speed has real value.<\/li>\n
                    • You need a built-in phone dialer alongside email sequences and you do not want to manage two separate tools. The Sales Engagement plan at $99 per user per month with a built-in dialer (including voicemail drop, local presence numbers, and call recording) is a legitimate value proposition for inside sales teams that cold call and cold email simultaneously.<\/li>\n
                    • You want predictable pricing without credit systems, rollover complexity, or add-on surprises. Mailshake’s pricing is closer to what you see on the pricing page than Lemlist’s actual bill tends to be, which makes budgeting simpler.<\/li>\n
                    • You prioritize customer support quality and want a team that will proactively help you optimize campaigns. Mailshake’s support reputation on G2 and Capterra is stronger than Lemlist’s by a meaningful margin.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                      When Neither Tool Is the Right Fit<\/h3>\n

                      There are scenarios where both Lemlist and Mailshake are not the optimal choice, and being honest about those scenarios matters more than a clean two-option verdict.<\/p>\n

                        \n
                      • If you are running high-volume cold email (5,000 or more emails per month) and need unlimited email accounts without per-seat pricing penalties, tools like Instantly ($37 per month flat, regardless of team size or inbox count) and Smartlead (unlimited email accounts on all plans) are structurally better suited. Both charge flat fees rather than per-seat, which changes the math significantly at scale. Instantly matches Lemlist on feature count and beats it on email deliverability benchmarks in direct testing, with a Starter plan at $37 per month that is cheaper than Lemlist’s entry plan.<\/li>\n
                      • If you need a B2B contact database alongside sequencing and you want both in one platform without paying separately for each, Apollo.io bundles a database of over 270 million contacts with email sequencing, LinkedIn steps, and a dialer. Apollo’s free tier and competitive paid plans make it a strong alternative for teams that need the prospecting layer, not just the sequencing layer.<\/li>\n
                      • If you are an agency managing outreach for multiple clients with 10 or more LinkedIn accounts running simultaneously, neither Lemlist nor Mailshake is built for that use case. Multi-account LinkedIn management at agency scale requires tools with dedicated agency dashboards and LinkedIn account rotation built around compliance, not email-first platforms that added LinkedIn as a feature.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                        Conclusion<\/h2>\n

                        The Lemlist vs. Mailshake decision comes down to one question more than any other: is LinkedIn a real part of your outreach motion right now, or is it something you might add later? If LinkedIn is live in your sequences today, and you are targeting prospects who get 20 cold emails a week and need something visually different to cut through, Lemlist is the better platform despite the higher per-seat cost and steeper learning curve. If your outreach runs on email, and you need a clean, fast setup with optional phone dialing, Mailshake delivers that at a lower price point with a better support experience.<\/p>\n

                        Before committing to either, run the actual team cost calculation using your specific user count, sending address requirements, and monthly lead volume. The base plan price is the starting point, not the final number. Lemlist’s 14-day free trial (no credit card required) gives you a risk-free window to run a real campaign and measure results. Mailshake does not offer a trial, so the research phase matters more before committing there.<\/p>\n

                        Pick the tool that matches the outreach motion you are actually running, not the one you think you might build toward someday.<\/p>\n

                        Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n

                        Does Mailshake have a free trial in 2026?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        No. Mailshake does not offer a free trial on any of its plans as of 2026. There is also no free plan. Potential customers must commit to a paid subscription (starting at $29 per user per month for the Starter plan) before gaining access to the platform. Mailshake does offer concierge onboarding and support resources to help new users get started, but there is no way to test the product before paying.<\/p>\n

                        Is Lemlist worth the price increase in 2026?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        For teams that actively use multichannel outreach (email plus LinkedIn plus calls) and rely on visual personalization features like dynamic images and personalized landing pages, Lemlist at $79 to $109 per user per month (new customer pricing) is still competitively priced given the feature depth. For teams doing email-only outreach at modest volume, the price increase makes Lemlist harder to justify when tools like Instantly and Saleshandy deliver similar email sequencing at a fraction of the cost. The value case depends heavily on whether you use the multichannel and personalization features that justify the premium.<\/p>\n

                        What is Lemlist’s credit system and how does it affect cost?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        Credits in Lemlist are the currency used to find and verify contact data through the Lead Finder. They are not used for sending emails (email sending is unlimited on all paid plans). The Email Pro plan includes 1,000 credits per month. Finding one verified email address costs 5 credits, meaning the base plan supports 200 email finds per month. Credits do not roll over at the end of each billing cycle, so unused credits are lost. If you run out of credits, you can purchase more at $50 for 5,000 credits ($0.01 per credit). Teams that do significant prospecting through Lemlist’s database should calculate their monthly credit needs carefully before choosing a plan, since the credit burn rate can meaningfully increase the real monthly cost.<\/p>\n

                        Can I use Lemlist for LinkedIn outreach safely?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        LinkedIn automation through Lemlist carries more safety risk than cloud-based LinkedIn tools because Lemlist’s LinkedIn features run through a Chrome extension that simulates browser actions. LinkedIn can detect non-human browser behavior through session analysis and action velocity patterns. Lemlist includes daily action limits and random delays between actions to reduce detection risk, but the Chrome extension architecture is inherently more detectable than tools that connect through LinkedIn’s mobile API or dedicated proxies. Teams for whom a LinkedIn account ban would be a serious business disruption should assess this risk carefully before using Lemlist’s LinkedIn features at high volume.<\/p>\n

                        How does Mailshake’s SHAKEspeare AI writer work?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        SHAKEspeare is Mailshake’s built-in AI email writer that generates personalized cold email copy by drawing from a dataset of successful cold email campaigns. It produces email drafts based on your prospect’s information and your campaign context, and it generates multiple A\/B variant versions using Spintax (a system that rotates synonyms and sentence structures). The A\/B variants serve two purposes: they enable split testing to identify the best-performing version, and they diversify the email content sent across recipients, which reduces the risk of spam detection triggered by sending identical emails at volume. SHAKEspeare is included on all Mailshake plans except the Starter tier.<\/p>\n

                        Which tool has better email deliverability, Lemlist or Mailshake?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        Lemlist has a more complete native deliverability toolset, including Lemwarm (a warm-up network), inbox rotation across multiple sending addresses, custom tracking domains, and send-time optimization. Mailshake provides spam score analysis, bounce detection, list cleaning credits, and a deliverability setup assistant, but lacks Lemlist’s warm-up network scale and inbox rotation depth. That said, deliverability is driven more by sending infrastructure (domain authentication, domain age, list quality, per-mailbox volume) than by the platform. A team with a properly configured sending setup will achieve good deliverability on either platform; a team with a misconfigured domain and dirty list will struggle on both.<\/p>\n

                        What happens to my Lemlist credits if I do not use them?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        Unused Lemlist credits expire at the end of each monthly billing cycle. They do not roll over to the following month. According to official Lemlist documentation updated in 2026, if you do not spend all your credits within the month, they are forfeited. This creates a “use it or lose it” dynamic that requires teams to plan their monthly prospecting activity around their credit allotment. If a team runs a slower outreach month due to a product launch hold or hiring pause, those credits are lost. Additional credits can be purchased at any time at $50 for 5,000 credits without requiring a plan upgrade.<\/p>\n

                        Can Mailshake replace a dedicated LinkedIn automation tool?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        No, not for teams that depend on LinkedIn as a primary outreach channel. Mailshake’s LinkedIn automation (available only on the $99 per user per month Sales Engagement plan) is limited to viewing profiles, following, sending connection requests, and sending direct messages. It does not support conditional LinkedIn sequences, smart reply detection, or advanced multi-step LinkedIn workflows. For teams where LinkedIn connection requests and follow-up messages are the primary pipeline driver, a dedicated LinkedIn automation tool built specifically for that channel will produce better results. Mailshake’s LinkedIn features work well as a secondary touchpoint in a sequence that is primarily driven by email.<\/p>\n

                        Which is better for agencies: Lemlist or Mailshake?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        Neither platform is purpose-built for agencies managing multiple clients, but Lemlist has a slight edge for smaller agency operations due to its feature depth and the ability to manage multiple campaigns from one account. Mailshake’s recommendation for agencies is to have each client create their own team and add the agency as a user, which means the client is the billed party. This is cleaner from an accounting perspective but adds administrative overhead for large client rosters. Both platforms charge per seat, which scales linearly with the number of agency users, making them expensive at scale. Agencies managing 10 or more client accounts with dedicated LinkedIn outreach should evaluate tools like HeyReach or Expandi, which are built for multi-account management at agency volume.<\/p>\n

                        What is the cheapest way to run cold email outreach in 2026?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        The most cost-effective cold email setups in 2026 typically combine a flat-fee sequencing tool with a separate email verification service. Instantly at $37 per month flat (regardless of users or inboxes) and Saleshandy starting at $25 per month are the lowest-cost serious outbound options. Both include unlimited email accounts, warm-up, and sequences. Adding a verified list from Apollo’s free tier (which includes 10,000 export credits per month at the free level) or a pay-as-you-go verification tool keeps list hygiene costs low. Mailshake’s Email Outreach plan at $59 per user per month is more expensive than these options but offers better onboarding support and a cleaner interface for teams that value simplicity over cost optimization.<\/p>\n

                        How do Lemlist and Mailshake handle CRM integration?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        Both Lemlist and Mailshake integrate natively with HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive. For Lemlist, CRM integrations are available starting from the Email Pro plan ($79 per user per month for new customers). For Mailshake, CRM integrations are available starting from the Email Outreach plan ($59 per user per month). In both cases, integrations log email activity (sends, opens, clicks, replies) to contact records and update deal stages based on prospect engagement. Lemlist’s HubSpot integration is generally rated more favorably for two-way sync depth. Mailshake’s HubSpot integration works but has been flagged in user reviews for slower sync frequency and some fields that require manual mapping.<\/p>\n

                        Is Lemwarm included in all Lemlist plans?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        Lemwarm is included in most Lemlist paid plans, but the exact inclusion depends on the plan tier and any ongoing changes to how Lemlist bundles add-ons. The Email Pro and Multichannel Expert plans both list Lemwarm and built-in deliverability protections as included. For the free plan and some legacy configurations, Lemwarm is either limited or charged separately at $29 per seat. Before signing up, confirm directly with Lemlist whether Lemwarm is bundled into your specific plan at the current pricing, since the bundling has changed alongside the February 2026 price restructuring.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                        Most cold email tool comparisons tell you both options are “great, it just depends on your needs.” That is not […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1664,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-comparison"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1659"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1659\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1665,"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1659\/revisions\/1665"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1664"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dealsflow.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}